111 Pacific Avenue, 255 Glenlake Avenue and 66 Oakmount Road (Minto)

You can view all the application documents here.

October 2017 Update - On Wednesday, October 26, we had the kickoff meeting for the High Park Apartment Area Character Study. While there was a fair turn out, and some good questions asked, there seems to be some lingering confusion with the study, and how it will work with the opponents appeal to the OMB. 

There are two important aspects of the character study. First, the character study is a chance for the community to be able to express their desires for what is to come to the neighbourhood in the future. No neighbourhood is static, so whether these proposals move forward or not, it is important that the community's views and concerns are recorded and addressed. Second, the study will also include the two proposals before us. Legally, each application is looked at separately, and must have their own final Staff Report to Council. While this will continue moving forward, the Character Study is able to link together the two applications, and examine the effects that the proposed changes would have on each other's development, as well as the community as a whole. (The study was set up to work in tandem with the two development applications as one will affect the other.) The Character Study will not come out in favour or opposed to the development applications, that is the job of the final staff report, but it will be used as an additional tool for Planning Staff's final report on these applications.  This is an opportunity for increasing the input from residents on not just what they oppose, but what they want to see in the community.

The community and I have made it very clear to the developers that we do not approve of their current applications. Both Great West Life (GWL) and Minto have told us they will be resubmitting their proposals after hearing from the community following the results of the Character Study. While we of course do not know what the developers will resubmit, we hope the new proposal will fit better with the wishes of the neighbourhood.

As you know, the applicants have made an OMB appeal. This does not mean that we are headed straight for an OMB hearing. In fact, following the provincial government's announcements for proposed changes to the OMB, every proposed development in our ward made an appeal to the OMB, with the hopes they are grandfathered in under the current rules.  Neither GWL nor Minto have asked for a hearing date, and have stated they will continue to work with residents and the City to submit an improved application.

There was some confusion over a "complete" application vs an approved or final application at Wednesday's meeting. As dictated by the Province, the City must examine all development proposals.  For a development proposal to be examined, they must submit a "complete" application, which includes a number of studies for their proposals such as impacts on traffic, sunlight, infrastructure, etc. (All the studies can be found here for Minto, and here for GWL.) When an application is deemed complete, the City will begin its first examination, and the 120 day countdown to a possible OMB appeal begins. This "complete" application does not mean it is will be the final application that goes to the City. In fact, of the large scale developments in our ward, not one has gone through to Council or the OMB with their original proposal since I have been a Councillor.  

Long story short, the door is not closed, no final decisions have been made. While I, and the greater community oppose these developments as they currently stand, this Character Study allows residents to solidify in City bylaws not just opposition, but what they want to see in their community. It is an important tool we are able to have moving forward, and I encourage anyone interested to get involved.

July 2017 Update - Minto has appealed their application to the Ontario Municipal Board. However, they have stated they are willing to continue working with the City and the community at large to help shape their proposal. 

May 2017 Update - The first public consultation took place on Monday, May 8, at 7:00 at Lithuania House (1573 Bloor Street West).  

January 2017 Update - This application was submitted by Minto. The location for the proposed development is between Pacific Avenue and Oakmount Road, south of Glenlake Ave. Minto reached out to my office to inform us they have submitted the same application that they presented at the pre-application meeting, as a means to avoid paying increased development permit fees that were introduced on January 1, 2017. They have stated that they will be submitting updated plans in late January / early February with a revised application. 

The current application consists of two blocks of 3-storey townhouses, one 33-storey tower, one 29-storey tower, 8-storey podium and a new 2 -storey amenity pavilion.

City Planning has informed me that this application is not complete. Once a completed application has been submitted, a public meeting will be hosted by the City Planning Division.

November 2016 Update - A pre-application public meeting was held by Minto at Lithuanian House on November 2nd where they presented their original plans.